New Bankruptcy Opinion: IN RE PREMIER PROPERTY ADVISORS, LLC – Bankr. Court, ED Michigan, 2015

In re: PREMIER PROPERTY ADVISORS, LLC, Chapter 11, Debtor.

Case No. 15-49995.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 30, 2015.


THOMAS J. TUCKER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Debtor has not filed a plan and disclosure statement, which was due to be filed no later than October 29, 2015. Nor has Debtor filed a motion to extend the October 29, 2015 deadline, either by the September 29, 2015 deadline for such a motion, or otherwise. See Order Establishing Deadlines and Procedures,” filed August 5, 2015 (Docket # 27, the “Scheduling Order”) at ¶¶ 1(c), 1(i), 10.

The Scheduling Order states, in ¶ 1(i), that the deadline for the Debtor to file a motion to extend the time to file a plan is September 29, 2015. Paragraph 10 of the Scheduling Order states, in pertinent part, that:

Any such motion [to extend the deadline to file a plan and disclosure statement] must be filed by the deadline in paragraph 1i. The motion must demonstrate by affidavit or otherwise that the request is necessary due to extraordinary and unforeseen circumstances.

The Scheduling Order states, in ¶ 2, that if the Debtor fails to meet the deadline for filing a combined plan and disclosure statement, “the case may be dismissed or converted to Chapter 7 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b)(4).” See 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b)(4)(J); see also In re Tax Shop, Inc., 173 B.R. 605, 607 n.3 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1994) (“The Court’s authority to dismiss a Chapter 11 case sua sponte in appropriate circumstances is clear under 11 U.S.C. § 105(a), which grants bankruptcy judges the broad authority to take action `necessary or appropriate . . . to prevent an abuse of process.'”); In re Nikron, Inc., 27 B.R. 773, 777 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 1983) (holding that “a [bankruptcy] court has the sua sponte power to convert or dismiss a chapter 11 case”)(relying on the court’s “inherent power and duty to control its docket, to preserve its integrity, and to insure that the legislation administered by the court will accomplish the legislative purpose”); In re Great American Pyramid Joint Venture, 144 B.R. 780, 789 (Bankr. W.D. Tenn. 1992) (“[A] bankruptcy judge may, under section 105(a), as amended, convert or dismiss a case sua sponte even though section 1112(b) explicitly requires that the request be made by a party in interest.”)

In addition, the Court notes that the Debtor filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case, on September 28, 2015 (Docket # 45). The deadline for the filing of any objections to such motion was October 22, 2015, and no objection has been filed. But the Debtor has not filed a certificate of no response or submitted a proposed order granting the motion to dismiss the case.


IT IS ORDERED that this Chapter 11 case is dismissed under 11 U.S.C. §§ 1112(b)(4)(E), 1112(b)(4)(J), and 105(a).

Save trees – read court opinions online on Google Scholar.


Leave a Reply